Supreme Court on Dissolution of Marriage under Article 142(1) and Maintenance under Section 25 HMA
Educational Article by Legal Light Consulting (LLC Lawyer)
Case Context
- Provision Invoked: Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India
- Issue: Whether an interlocutory application seeking dissolution of marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage is maintainable in a pending transfer petition under Section 25 CPC.
- Observation: Hindu marriage is a sacrament, a sacred institution forming the foundation of family life. However, in this case, the parties failed to adhere to their marital oath.
Supreme Court’s Findings
Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage:
The Court held that the marriage had completely failed.
Determining fault was unnecessary; the focus was on the irreconcilable status of the relationship.
Absence of Children:
Since no child was born from the wedlock, dissolution would only affect the parties themselves, not any innocent child.
This factor weighed in favour of exercising discretion under Article 142(1).
Exercise of Discretion:
The Court dissolved the marriage under Article 142(1), emphasizing that reconciliation was impossible.
The interlocutory application was held maintainable.
Maintenance and Permanent Alimony under Section 25 HMA
No Fixed Formula: The Court reiterated that there is no rigid formula for calculating maintenance or permanent alimony.
Balanced Consideration: Determination must be based on a balanced view of multiple factors, which are illustrative but not exhaustive.
Factors Considered:
Wife’s income and financial independence
Her reasonable needs
Right of residence
Lifestyle enjoyed during marriage
Other relevant circumstances
Key Principle: Quantum of alimony cannot be decided solely on the husband’s income or past payments. It must reflect fairness and equity.
Educational Insight for your knowledge
This judgment highlights two important aspects:
The Supreme Court’s unique discretionary power under Article 142(1) to dissolve marriages when reconciliation is impossible.
The flexible approach to maintenance under Section 25 HMA, ensuring fairness by considering both parties’ circumstances.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. What is Article 142(1) of the Constitution for NRI in India?
It empowers the Supreme Court to pass orders necessary to do complete justice, including dissolving marriages on irretrievable breakdown grounds.
2. Can the Supreme Court dissolve a marriage even if fault is not proven for NRI in India?
Yes. Unlike Family Courts, the Supreme Court can dissolve a marriage without determining fault, focusing instead on whether reconciliation is impossible.
3. Why was the absence of children important in this case for NRI in India?
Because dissolution affected only the spouses and not any child, making it easier for the Court to exercise discretion.
4. What is Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for NRI in India ?
It deals with maintenance and permanent alimony, allowing the Court to grant financial support to a spouse after divorce.
5. How is permanent alimony calculated for NRi in India?
There is no fixed formula. Courts consider factors such as:
- Income of both spouses
- Reasonable needs of the wife
- Right of residence
- Lifestyle during marriage
- Other relevant circumstances
6. Does maintenance depend only on the husband’s income for NRI in India?
No. The wife’s entitlement is based on her own needs, rights, and circumstances, not just the husband’s earnings.
7. Can an interlocutory application for divorce be filed in a transfer petition for NRI in India ?
Yes. The Supreme Court held such an application maintainable under Article 142(1).
8. Why is the Supreme Court’s role unique compared to Family Courts for NRI in India?
Family Courts are bound by statutory provisions and fault‑based grounds. The Supreme Court, under Article 142(1), can act as a problem solver, balancing equities to ensure justice.
9. What happens if reconciliation is possible for NRI in India?
The Supreme Court will not dissolve the marriage unless it is convinced that reconciliation is impossible and the marriage has completely failed.
10. Why consult Legal Light Consulting (LLC Lawyer) for NRI in India?
LLC Lawyer specializes in Supreme Court practice, transfer petitions, matrimonial disputes, and maintenance claims, offering expert guidance tailored to client needs.
An interlocutory application under Article 142(1) of the Constitution can be used, in a pending transfer petition under Section 25 CPC, to seek dissolution of marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown; in appropriate facts the Supreme Court has held such an application maintainable and granted divorce along with directions on permanent alimony.
This creates an important intersection between transfer petitions, Article 142(1) powers, and maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Educational article for Legal Light Consulting – LLC Lawyer
Divorce and Alimony in a Transfer Petition: How the Supreme Court Used Article 142(1)
In some exceptional matrimonial disputes, the Supreme Court of India has not only decided where a divorce case should be heard, but has also dissolved the marriage itself and fixed permanent alimony while dealing with a pending transfer petition. T
his has been done by invoking Article 142(1) of the Constitution, which allows the Court to pass orders necessary to do “complete justice” between the parties.
This article (for educational purposes only) explains how this works, and what it means for clients involved in transfer petitions and high‑conflict matrimonial litigation.
1. Interlocutory application for divorce within a transfer petition
Ordinarily, a transfer petition under Section 25 CPC only asks the Supreme Court to move a pending case (for example, a divorce petition) from one Family Court or District Court to another.
However, in some cases the parties file an interlocutory application (IA) within that transfer petition, requesting the Supreme Court to dissolve the marriage itself on the ground of irretrievable breakdown.
The Supreme Court has held that such an IA can be maintainable in a suitable case, because:
-
The Court is already seized of the matrimonial dispute through the transfer petition.
-
Article 142(1) empowers it to pass any order required to do complete justice, including dissolving the marriage when it has completely failed.
-
Deciding only the place of trial, while leaving a dead marriage to drag on in another court, may sometimes defeat the purpose of justice.
This does not mean every transfer petition will end in divorce, but it shows that the Supreme Court can, where justified, convert a purely procedural dispute into a final resolution of the marriage.
2. Sacred nature of Hindu marriage vs reality of breakdown
The Supreme Court has repeatedly acknowledged that under Hindu law, marriage is traditionally treated as a sacrament: a sacred, lifelong bond and the foundation of the family, not a commercial contract.
Yet, in hard cases the Court recognises that some couples no longer adhere to their marital oath and that the relationship has become irreconcilable.
In such a situation:
-
The Court does not focus on “which party is at fault” in the detailed sense a Family Court must examine under the Hindu Marriage Act.
-
Instead, it looks at the entire factual matrix and asks whether the marriage has completely failed, with no realistic chance of the parties cohabiting as husband and wife again.
-
If the answer is yes, it may invoke Article 142(1) to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown, in order to spare both spouses further litigation and emotional harm.
This approach is holistic rather than fault‑centric and is reserved for exceptional situations.
3. Why absence of children can be relevant
In at least one significant case, the Supreme Court noted that no child had been born from the wedlock, and treated this as a factor favouring divorce under Article 142(1).
The reasoning is:
-
Where there are minor children, any dissolution and re‑arrangement of rights can directly affect them; the Court must protect their welfare and stability.
-
Where there are no children, a decision allowing the parties to part ways primarily affects the spouses themselves, and does not directly disrupt the life of an innocent child.
-
In a dead marriage with no children and long‑standing hostility, continuing the formal bond may serve little purpose.
This is not a rigid rule; it is one among many considerations (such as duration of separation, failed settlements, and multiplicity of cases) that can tip the balance toward dissolution under Article 142(1).
4. Permanent alimony under Section 25 HMA: how the Court fixes the amount
Alongside dissolution of marriage, the Supreme Court often considers permanent alimony/maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Court has summarised the governing principles as follows:
-
There is no fixed formula or percentage for calculating permanent alimony; each case depends on its own facts.
-
The Court must take a balanced view, considering multiple factors such as:
-
Income and earning capacity of both spouses.
-
Age, health, and employability of the wife (or the spouse claiming maintenance).
-
Reasonable needs, including residence, medical needs, and standard of living.
-
Duration of marriage and contributions (including non‑monetary, like child‑care or home‑making).
-
Existing assets, liabilities, and any earlier payments or settlements.
-
Importantly:
-
The quantum does not depend solely on what the husband may have paid to a previous spouse or only on his current salary.
-
The claimant spouse’s own income, prospects, and reasonable needs are equally relevant.
-
The goal is a fair and realistic provision, not a windfall or a way to “match” the other spouse’s wealth.
This nuanced approach is often applied when the Supreme Court dissolves a marriage under Article 142(1) and wants to close all financial disputes in one composite order.
5. FAQs (educational, not legal advice)
Q1. Can the Supreme Court grant divorce in my transfer petition?
Possibly, but only in exceptional cases. The Court must be convinced that the marriage has irretrievably broken down and that using Article 142(1) is necessary to do complete justice. Filing an interlocutory application in a transfer petition does not guarantee divorce.
Q2. Do I have to prove who was “at fault” if I seek divorce under Article 142(1)?
The Supreme Court does not conduct a full fault‑finding trial like the Family Court. It looks at the entire history of the relationship, including separation, prior litigation, and failed mediations, to decide if the marriage has completely failed and reconciliation is impossible.
Q3. Does the presence or absence of children matter?
Yes, it can. Where there are minor children, the Court must carefully consider their best interests before dissolving a marriage. Where there are no children, the Court may find it easier to permit the spouses to part ways since only their lives are directly impacted.
Q4. How does the Court decide permanent alimony in such cases?
There is no fixed percentage. The Court looks at both parties’ incomes, needs, standard of living, health, age, length of marriage, and prior payments or settlements. The aim is a fair, need‑based, and sustainable amount, not a punitive or symbolic figure.
Q5. Can I rely on Article 142(1) strategy at the very start of my case?
Most divorces still begin in the Family Court under the Hindu Marriage Act. Article 142(1) is typically considered only when a matter has already reached the Supreme Court (for example, through a transfer petition or appeal) and the facts clearly show a dead marriage.
Q6. How can Legal Light Consulting – LLC Lawyer assist in such matters?
A firm experienced in Supreme Court practice can:
-
Evaluate whether your case is suitable for a transfer petition under Section 25 CPC and whether an Article 142(1) application is realistic.
-
Strategically present the full history of separation, mediation, and financial circumstances.
-
Help negotiate or argue fair permanent alimony under Section 25 HMA so that both divorce and financial issues are resolved together.
Disclaimer:
This article and FAQ are for educational and informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any lawyer–client relationship.
Legal outcomes depend on specific facts and the discretion of the Court.
For advice tailored to your situation, please consult a qualified advocate or contact the team at Legal Light Consulting – LLC Lawyer
Notes : This article and FAQ are for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice. For professional assistance, consult Legal Light Consulting (LLC Lawyer).
