Special Leave Petitions: A Glimpse Into Supreme Court Proceedings

The Supreme Court of India serves as the apex authority for dispensing justice and upholding the Constitution.

The procedural nuances of filing petitions and applications in the Supreme Court are critical for litigants seeking redressal. One such document, an application for exemption from filing official translated copies of annexures, provides a window into the meticulous legal processes involved.

Understanding the Context

In a case titled “ABCD vs. Union of India & Ors.,” the petitioner has approached the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution.

This article grants the Supreme Court the discretionary power to allow appeals from any court or tribunal within India.

The case highlights an appeal against a Bombay High Court judgment that reversed a tribunal’s decision in favor of the petitioner, resulting in the termination of the petitioner from a teaching post.

The petitioner alleges that their termination was a result of exposing irregularities and mismanagement in the school’s administration. The petitioner also cites adverse remarks in their confidential report following the whistleblowing.

The Core Application

In the Special Leave Petition (SLP), the petitioner filed an application seeking exemption from submitting official translated copies of annexures marked as P-4 and P-5.

These documents were originally in the vernacular language, and translations were prepared due to time constraints. The petitioner requests the Court to accept these unofficial translations, arguing that the matter’s urgency necessitated this step.

Legal Procedure and Relevance

This application underscores a crucial aspect of legal proceedings—adherence to procedural requirements while addressing practical challenges.

Annexures like P-4 and P-5 are critical evidence supporting the petitioner’s claims. The application serves as a formal request to the Court, emphasizing that justice should not be delayed or denied due to procedural technicalities.

The petitioner prays for the following reliefs:

1. Permission to bring the translations of Annexures P-4 and P-5 on record.
2. Any other order deemed appropriate by the Hon’ble Court.

Role of Legal Professionals

Navigating such complex processes requires expertise. Legal professionals play an indispensable role in ensuring that petitions, annexures, and accompanying applications meet the stringent requirements of the judiciary.

Application for exemption from filing officially translated documents with the Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UNDER ORDER XXI, RULE 3(1) (a)

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(UNDER ARTICLE 136 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA)

I.A. No. 0f 20__

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. _____OF 20___

BETWEEN:

ABCD                                                                     ….PETITIONER

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA &Ors.                                         ….RESPONDENTS

APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILLING OFFICIAL TRANSLATED COPIES OF ANNEXURE P-4 to P-5

To
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA
AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

The Humble application of the Petitioner above-named

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the present Special Leave Petition is being preferred against the final judgment/ order dated 4 November 2016 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. ____of 2017 filed by the Petitioner and Writ Petition No. ___of 2017 filed by the Respondents by a common judgment/ order wherein the Hon’ble Court erroneously and without appreciating the evidence on record reversed the order dated 29.11.2013, passed by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Mumbai (hereinafter ‘Tribunal’) and confirmed the termination of the Petitioner from the post of full-time Teacher at ____ Junior College of Science managed by ____Education Society.
2. That all the facts leading to filing of this petition have been set out in detail in the accompanying Special Leave Petition and the same are not being repeated herein for the sake of brevity.
3. That the Petitioner brought into light several illegalities and mismanagement in management of the school affairs. A copy of the letter dated 19.12.2016 by the Petitioner to the Secretary, School Education; ____ State is annexed and marked as Annexure P-4 (Pages to ).
4. That immediately after the aforementioned complaint made vide letter dated 29.12.2014, the Petitioner was victimized by making adverse remarks in his Confidential Report. A copy of the letter dated 29.12.2014 is annexed and marked as Annexure P-5 (Pages to ).
5. That many documents annexed to the Petition are in the vernacular, the annexure being Annexure P- 4 & P-5 and due to urgency in the matter and paucity of time, the Petitioner has got the documents translated by a person who is not an official translator but who is well conversant in both the languages and the same may be taken on record.

P R A Y E R

In the above circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

1. a) Permit the Petitioner to bring on record additional documents as Annexure P-4 to P-5,
2. b) Pass such other order and further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the interest of justice.

FILED BY:

_________
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER

Drawn by: _____ Advocate

Drawn On:
Filed On:

For expert legal assistance in Supreme Court matters, contact Legal Light Consulting—your trusted partner for navigating the complexities of India’s highest court

Firms like Legal Light Consulting, specializing in Supreme Court cases, provide invaluable guidance in drafting and filing petitions, preparing annexures, and managing legal intricacies.

Conclusion

The application exemplifies how procedural diligence is balanced with the pursuit of substantive justice. In cases involving alleged victimization and whistleblower retaliation, such as the one at hand, the judiciary’s role in ensuring fair treatment becomes paramount.

For litigants, the expertise of legal professionals ensures that their grievances are effectively presented before the Court, facilitating justice delivery.