Transfer Petition in Matrimonial Disputes in Supreme Court of India

Transfer Petition in Matrimonial Disputes: An Educational Overview

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only. For specific legal advice, please consult a qualified expert or lawyer.

 Introduction

Transfer petitions under Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) are a vital mechanism in matrimonial disputes. They allow the Supreme Court to transfer proceedings from one State to another when circumstances justify such relief. The Court considers convenience, fairness, and justice before granting or refusing transfer.

Case Context

  • Parties: Husband and wife, both doctors, living separately and without children.
  • Proceedings:
    • Husband filed a divorce petition.
    • Wife filed a maintenance petition.
  • Transfer sought: Wife requested transfer of proceedings to the State where she resided with her parents.
  • Respondent husband: Did not appear despite notice and did not contest the transfer petition.

 Legal Framework

Section 25, CPC, 1908

  • Grants the Supreme Court authority to transfer cases between States.
  • Considerations include:
    • Convenience of parties.
    • Interests of justice.
    • Status of parties and fairness in proceedings.

Procedural Safeguards

  • If the respondent does not appear, the Court may proceed ex parte.
  • However, the respondent retains the right to seek modification or recall of the transfer order if it is later found that notice was not properly served.

 Judicial Findings

  • The wife’s petition for transfer was allowed, given her residence with her parents and the husband’s non-appearance.
  • The Court clarified:
    • The respondent husband is entitled to seek modification/recall of the transfer order within three months if it is found that he was not served with the Acknowledgement Due (AD) notice as reported by the office.
    • The transfer petition was disposed of in these terms.
    • Any pending applications stood disposed of accordingly.

 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1. What is a transfer petition under Section 25 CPC?

A: It is a request made to the Supreme Court to transfer a case from one State to another, usually for convenience or fairness.

Q2. Why was the transfer petition allowed in this case?

A: The wife was residing with her parents in another State, and the husband did not contest the petition despite notice.

Q3. What happens if the respondent was not properly served with notice?

A: The respondent husband can seek modification or recall of the transfer order within three months, ensuring procedural fairness.

Q4. Does the transfer petition affect pending applications?

A: Yes. Once the transfer petition is disposed of, any pending applications connected to it also stand disposed of.

Q5. Why is the absence of children relevant in matrimonial disputes?

A: The absence of children often simplifies proceedings, as custody and child welfare issues do not arise, allowing the Court to focus solely on matrimonial and financial matters.

Key Learnings

  • Transfer petitions balance convenience and justice between parties.
  • Non-appearance of a respondent does not prevent the Court from granting relief, but safeguards like recall/modification rights protect fairness.
  • Both parties being professionals (here, doctors) and living separately without children influenced the Court’s pragmatic approach.
  • Procedural compliance, especially proper service of notice, remains critical in matrimonial litigation.

FAQ on Transfer Petition in Matrimonial Disputes (Educational Purpose)

Disclaimer: This FAQ is for educational purposes only. For specific legal advice, please consult a qualified lawyer.

 General Questions

Q1. What is a transfer petition under Section 25 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908?

A: A transfer petition allows the Supreme Court to move a case from one State to another when circumstances justify such relief, usually for convenience, fairness, or justice.

Q2. Why did the wife seek transfer of proceedings in this case?

A: The wife sought transfer of the matrimonial proceedings to the State where she was residing with her parents, citing convenience and support.

Q3. What was the husband’s response to the transfer petition?

A: The husband did not appear despite notice and did not contest the transfer petition.

Q4. What did the Court decide regarding the transfer petition?

A: The Court allowed the transfer petition and disposed of it in those terms.

Procedural Safeguards

Q5. What happens if the husband was not properly served with notice?

A: The Court clarified that the respondent husband is entitled to seek modification or recall of the transfer order within three months if it is found that he was not served with the Acknowledgement Due (AD) notice as reported by the office.

Q6. What happens to pending applications once the transfer petition is disposed of?

A: All pending applications connected to the transfer petition stand disposed of along with the main petition.

Case Context

Q7. What were the matrimonial proceedings involved?

A:

  • Husband filed a divorce petition.
  • Wife filed a maintenance petition.

Q8. What is relevant about the parties’ background?

A: Both parties are doctors, living separately, and there is no child from the marriage.

 Key Learnings

  • Transfer petitions can be allowed when one party demonstrates genuine need and the other does not contest.
  • Even if a petition is allowed ex parte, the respondent retains the right to seek recall/modification if notice was not properly served.
  • Courts ensure procedural fairness by balancing convenience with safeguards.
  • Pending applications automatically conclude once the transfer petition is disposed of.
8th December 2025
Recent posts
Request a Call Back
Featured posts
Featured Templets