Understanding Cheque Misuse in Friendly Loan and Security Cheque Disputes
Understanding Cheque Misuse in Friendly Loan and Security Cheque Disputes
Educational Article – By Legal Light Consulting | India’s Trusted Legal Advisors
(Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For professional consultation, please contact Legal Light Consulting.)
Scenario 1: Friendly Loan – Misuse of Cheque by the Complainant
In many cheque bounce or Section 138 NI Act cases, the accused claims that the cheque issued was not towards a legally enforceable debt but was misused by the complainant — often a friend or acquaintance.
A common defense is that the cheque was issued in good faith or as a blank cheque, and that no loan was ever given.
Explanation of the Cheque Issued
Before building a defense, the accused must clarify the condition under which the cheque was handed over. For example, it might have been given as:
-
A blank cheque for future security
-
A goodwill gesture between friends
-
A backup for an uncertain or pending transaction
The defense must emphasize the absence of any real financial transaction.
Cross-Examination Strategy (Friendly Loan Defense)
To challenge the complainant’s version, the following questions must be asked to test credibility and highlight inconsistencies:
Loan Disbursal Details
-
What was the mode of payment of the alleged loan?
-
If it was in cash, can you show corresponding bank withdrawals?
-
If the cash amount is large, what was your source of such funds?
-
Have you filed an Income Tax Return (ITR) disclosing this loan?
-
Have you declared the loan amount in your balance sheet?
-
Do you have a voucher or any written acknowledgment from the accused?
-
Was the balance sheet audited by a CA?
Suggestion for Defense:
“You have not extended any loan. You have misused the cheque issued in trust.”
Scenario 2: Security Cheque – Not Issued Against Any Debt
Another common defense is that the cheque was a “security cheque”, not intended to be presented unless specific conditions were met — such as non-payment, breach of contract, or future obligations.
Explanation of Security Cheque
The accused can claim that the cheque was:
-
Issued as collateral for future business dealings
-
Part of a security package for pending services
-
Not meant to be deposited unless mutually agreed
Cross-Examination Strategy (Security Cheque Defense)
To support this claim, the following cross-examination can be conducted:
-
For how many years have you been dealing with the accused?
-
How do you generally settle accounts?
-
Do you take security cheques from others as well?
-
Do you maintain a statement of accounts?
-
Can you produce the statement of account?
-
On the date of cheque issuance, did the accused owe you the cheque amount?
Key Argument:
“The accused did not owe you any money on the said date. You have misused a security cheque.”
Frequently Asked Questions for Cross-Examination
These questions aim to break down the complainant’s narrative and expose weak points:
-
Is it true that even before this, Ashok ji had taken a loan from you?
-
Do you usually give friendly loans to your acquaintances?
-
Can you name other persons you’ve helped this way?
-
Was the loan ever paid in cash or through bank transfer?
-
Do you remember the amount and the dates of disbursal?
-
Did Ashok ji return any of your past loans on time?
-
What was the stated purpose of this loan?
-
Did you inquire about the use of this large amount?
-
Was any agreement or acknowledgment signed?
-
Were there any witnesses present during the cash transaction?
-
Have you made those witnesses part of this case?
-
Where and when was the money given? Do you remember the location and time?
-
Did you follow up with Ashok ji before depositing the cheque?
-
What kind of assurance did you receive before depositing the cheque?
-
Did you know Ashok ji’s financial capacity to return the money within a year?
Defense Insight:
“You lent such a large sum without verifying purpose, financial capacity, or signing a loan agreement. This shows the transaction was either not genuine or unsubstantiated.”
Legal Pointers
-
Burden of Proof: The complainant must prove that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt.
-
Section 139 NI Act: Presumes the cheque was issued for consideration, but this presumption is rebuttable.
-
Defense Strategy: Create reasonable doubt regarding the loan’s existence and its conditions.
Conclusion
In nearly 80% of cheque bounce cases, either the “friendly loan” or “security cheque” scenario forms the crux of the defense.
The success of the accused heavily depends on the cross-examination strategy, documentation (or lack thereof), and how well the credibility of the complainant is challenged.
If you or someone you know is facing a similar situation, seeking professional legal advice is crucial.
Contact Legal Light Consulting – LLC Lawyer
India’s Trusted NRI and Cheque Bounce Law Firm
📩 Email: contact@legalightconsulting.com
🌐 Website: www.legallightconsulting.com
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific legal support, contact Legal Light Consulting directly. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this article.
